ss_blog_claim=bca479400475e5ef519a8d6522866a06

Last Blogger

The last blogger to the gate

Last Blogger header image 1

2009 Pontiac G5

April 25th, 2009 · 21 Comments · cars

We just returned from a trip to Newfoundland. While we were there, we rented a car and I once again got the opportunity to test drive a new car. I usually have a leaning towards foreign vehicles, despite some of their quips and quirks. I do try to be open minded about these things though. Obviously, there are differences that may or may not matter to most. The shift points were a little different than what I’m used to, but they were still very reasonable.

pontiac-g5

The interior was pretty basic, but standard for the class. Cloth and plastic all over. The engine had torque though it felt like it was in a much higher RPM range than the Beta II in my Elantra. That’s one thing I didn’t like that much. I’m a fan of lower-end torque because during day-to day driving, most drivers don’t end up that high up in the RPM range. The fuel gauge spanned 3/4 of a circle. While it doesn’t really seem like it should matter, it certainly gave the impression of poor mileage. Even the briefest of drives seemed to move the needle. I doubt it was anywhere near as bad as my eyes told me. The Kilometer count and rough estimate of fuel I put in set the fuel consumption somewhere in and around the 10 L / 100 km range. That’s about the same as I get with my Elantra, though I do much more city driving with my car than I did with the G5.

Ride quality was a mixed bag. It was nice and firm at highway speeds, offering some fairly predictable lane changes, but upon accelerating hard from a stop, or through a corner, it felt more like a bucking bronco than a sporty little car. It wasn’t out of control, but it was beyond what most would describe as comfortable. The low profile tires helped when you were at speed, but wow, hit a pothole and your teeth fillings would rattle.

Fit of body panels and overall design of those same body panels was poor for today’s standards. Sure you can get away with this lack of thought thirty years ago, but in today’s market, you’re killing yourself. So there’s a few spots where the panels just don’t seem to come together properly. They were just too far apart. Then there’s the crinkles. Seriously, how can you show sheet metal like this? I have no doubt that there are crinkles like this on my Hyundai, but there’s one major difference. You can’t see them. In case GM isn’t aware, you can hide these things with the plastic trim that’s hiding most of the seams. In the G5’s case, the trim just seems to fell short leaving the crinkles. Now this isn’t an assembly issue, it’s a fundamental design flaw.

pontiac-panel-gap pontiac-crinkle

So was there anything good about the car? Well it was a car. It worked, got us to where we needed to be. The only true problem with it is its competition. The G5 is simply not up to the task of competing with the other vehicles in its class. If perfect information was available and consumers would make educated decisions, I have a hard time believing they could really sell any of these things.

I’m not a market expert. I’m just a consumer, and GM is just a company dying due to lack of connection with the consumer. So you can take what you want from this review.

Tags: ·

21 Comments so far ↓