<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Controversy On The Web?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lastblogger.com/archives/126/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lastblogger.com/archives/126</link>
	<description>The last blogger to the gate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:04:31 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://lastblogger.com/archives/126/comment-page-1#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 20:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastblogger.com/archives/126#comment-867</guid>
		<description>Ah, I thought the &quot;sponsored post&quot; was a requirement. Kudos, for what it&#039;s worth I appreciate that. My problem with it isn&#039;t so much the advertising -- well I mean, it sort of is, but that&#039;s a ridiculously grey/nebulous area... what differentiates it from real advertising (ie a banner)? What if I really like a product and give it a write-up out of the goodness of my heart? etc. My problem is more that it&#039;s somewhat of an insidious form of advertising, like product placement in TV/movies. It doesn&#039;t really give you the option to &quot;not watch/read/listen&quot; because it&#039;s not honest up-front about what it really is.

For example, for most of your sponsored posts, while I was suspicious of them given the tone and subject matter, I would have given you the benefit of the doubt about them being legit had I not seen your tagging. A few of them I would have, but only because of the google-friendly-keyword-packed-domains.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I thought the &#8220;sponsored post&#8221; was a requirement. Kudos, for what it&#8217;s worth I appreciate that. My problem with it isn&#8217;t so much the advertising &#8212; well I mean, it sort of is, but that&#8217;s a ridiculously grey/nebulous area&#8230; what differentiates it from real advertising (ie a banner)? What if I really like a product and give it a write-up out of the goodness of my heart? etc. My problem is more that it&#8217;s somewhat of an insidious form of advertising, like product placement in TV/movies. It doesn&#8217;t really give you the option to &#8220;not watch/read/listen&#8221; because it&#8217;s not honest up-front about what it really is.</p>
<p>For example, for most of your sponsored posts, while I was suspicious of them given the tone and subject matter, I would have given you the benefit of the doubt about them being legit had I not seen your tagging. A few of them I would have, but only because of the google-friendly-keyword-packed-domains.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
